|
Disability and
the Digital Divide
Americans with disabilities are less than half as likely as their
non-disabled counterparts to own a computer, and they are about one-quarter as
likely to use the Internet. These are the conclusions of a new report1
on computer ownership and Internet use among people with disabilities, based on
December 1998 data from the Current Population Survey, a nationally
representative sample of U.S. households. For the purpose of this analysis,
disability is defined in terms of a limitation in the ability to work: those
respondents reported to have a "health problem or disability which prevents
them from working or which limits the amount or kind of work they can do"
are counted as having disabilities. The statistics presented in this abstract
apply to the population 15 years of age or older.
Computer technology and the Internet have a tremendous potential to broaden the
lives and increase the independence of people with disabilities. To a population
that is often physically as well as socially isolated, they can offer access to
information, social interaction, cultural activities, employment opportunities,
and consumer goods. Screen readers can provide blind people with instant access
to vast quantities of on-line information, without having to wait for Braille or
audiotape; voice recognition can enable people with limited manual dexterity to
write letters, manage their finances, or perform work-related tasks. But, as the
data in this abstract demonstrate, very few people with disabilities are able to
take advantage of these possibilities.
As shown in
Figure 1,
just under one-quarter (23.9 percent) of people with disabilities have access to
a computer at home, compared to just over half (51.7 percent) of their
non-disabled counterparts. The gap in Internet use is even more striking: Only
one-tenth (9.9 percent) of people with disabilities connect to the Internet,
compared to almost four-tenths (38.1 percent) of those without disabilities.
Elderly people with disabilities are particularly unlikely to make use of these
technologies. Among persons 65 years of age or older, only one-tenth (10.6
percent) of those with disabilities have computers at home, compared to
one-quarter (25.3 percent) of those without disabilities. And only a tiny
fraction (2.2 percent) of elderly people with disabilities use the Internet, a
rate about one-quarter that of the non-disabled elderly population (8.9
percent).
Among the non-elderly (aged 1564), the gaps in access to these technologies
are less dramatic but still pronounced: 32.6 percent of those with disabilities
have computers and 15.1 percent use the Internet, compared to 55.6 percent and
42.3 percent, respectively, of their counterparts without disabilities.
Educational attainment
The more education a person has, the more likely he or she is to own computer
equipment and to use it to connect to the Internet. But regardless of the level
of educational attainment, people with disabilities have much lower rates of
computer ownership and Internet use than their non-disabled peers (Figure
2).
Only one-eighth (12.7 percent) of people with disabilities who have not
graduated from high school own computers. This figure compares with one-third
(34.5 percent) of non-high-school-graduates without disabilities, almost half
(46.5 percent) of college graduates with disabilities, and three-quarters (73.4
percent) of college graduates without disabilities.
Only 2.4 percent of people with disabilities who lack high school diplomas use
the Internet. Those without disabilities are almost 10 times as likely to
connect to the Internet (22.5 percent). People with disabilities who have
college degrees have still higher rates of Internet use (30.2 percent); but even
this figure is less than half that for college graduates without disabilities,
almost two-thirds (63.9 percent) of whom are Internet users.
Family income
People with and without disabilities who have low incomes are much less likely
to have access to computer technology than are those with greater financial
resources (Figure 3). But
regardless of income, people with disabilities own computers significantly less
often than do their non-disabled counterparts: half as often for persons with
family incomes under $20,000 per year (11.0 percent vs. 22.2 percent), and
two-thirds as often for those with family incomes of $20,000 or more (40.0 vs.
61.2 percent).
Within both income groups, use of the Internet also varies significantly by
disability status. Only 4.9 percent of people with disabilities who have low
family incomes use the Internet, compared to almost four times as high a
proportion (19.0 percent) of the non-disabled population. Among people with
moderate or high incomes, 16.6 percent of those with disabilities and 45.2
percent of those without disabilities connect to the Internet.
Race and ethnicity
Figure 4 presents
statistics on household computer ownership and Internet access, broken
down into racial and ethnic categories. The race and ethnicity of a household is
determined by that of the person in whose name the dwelling is owned or rented;
when a household contains one or more members with a disability, it is
classified as a household with a disability.
Within each racial and ethnic group, the rate of computer ownership is much less
when there is a disability present in the household than when there is not.2
Among white households, those with disabilities are about half as likely to own
computers as are those without (26.8 vs. 50.2 percent). Among African American
households, only one-tenth (10.7 percent) of those with disabilities have
computers, compared to one-quarter (26.3 percent) of households having no
members with disabilities. Some 37.8 percent of Asian and Pacific Islander
households with disabilities have computers, compared to 56.9 percent of those
without disabilities. And among Latino households, 19.0 percent of those with
disabilities have computers, versus 32.7 percent of those with no disability.
There are also large gaps in Internet access within the racial categories.3
Across the board, households having members with disabilities are roughly half
as likely to be connected to the Internet as those with no members with
disabilities (for white households, 13.3 vs. 30.7 percent; for black households,
4.8 vs. 11.4 percent; for Asian/Pacific Islander, 19.7 vs. 35.9 percent).
Among those households with disabilities, African American households are much
less likely than white households to have a computer (10.7 vs. 26.8 percent) or
have access to the Internet (4.8 vs. 13.3 percent).4 It is worth
noting that the rates for white households with disabilities (26.8 percent of
which have computers and 13.3 percent of which have access to the Internet) are
roughly equal to those of African American households without disabilities (26.3
and 11.4 percent, respectively). Thus, disability and race can be seen to be
equally significant factors in determining the household's likelihood of
exposure to computer technology.
NOTES:
1 Kaye, H.S. (2000). Computer and Internet Use Among People with
Disabilities. Disability Statistics Report (13). Washington DC: U.S.
Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research.
2 Because of the small sample size of Native Americans with
disabilities, data on computer ownership and Internet use among this population
are statistically unreliable and have not been presented in this abstract.
3 Among Latinos, the difference in Internet access rates between
those with and without disabilities is not statistically significant.
4 Among households with disabilities, differences between whites and
Asian/Pacific Islanders and between people of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin
are not statistically significant.
PUBLISHER:
Published by U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR).
CREDITS:
The Disability Statistics Abstract series is produced by the Disability
Statistics Center, Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing,
University of California, 3333 California St., Suite 340, San Francisco, CA
94118, with funding from NIDRR. World Wide Web address:
dsc.ucsf.edu
This report was prepared under ED grant #H133B30002. The views expressed herein
are those of the grantee. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Education is intended or should be inferred.
AVAILABILITY:
The full text of this public domain publication is available at the Department's
home page at
www.ed.gov
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format
(e.g., Braille, large-print, audio tape, or computer diskette) on request.
|